Significado diagnóstico y pronóstico del Gated-SPECT en mujeres con bloqueo de rama izquierda y baja probabilidad pre-test para cardiopatía isquémica


  1. Orzan F, Garcia E, Mathur VS, Hall RJ. Is the treadmill exercise test useful for evaluating coronary artery disease in patients with complete left bundle branch block? Am J Cardiol 1978;42:36-40.
  2. Biagini E, Shaw LJ, Poldermans D, et al. Accuracy of non-invasive techniques for diagnosis of coronary artery disease and prediction of cardiac events in patients with left bundle branch block: a meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:1442-51.
  3. Kumar V, Venkataraman R, Aljaroudi W, et al. Implications of left bundle branch block in patient treatment. Am J Cardiol 2013;111:291-300.
  4. Krishnan R, Lu J, Zhu YY, et al. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in left bundle branch block: a perspective on the issue from image analysis in a clinical context. Am Heart J 1993;126:578-86.
  5. Davies M, Harris A. Pathological basis of primary heart block. Br Heart J 1969;31:219-26.
  6. Rotman M, Triebwasser JH. A clinical and follow-up study of right and left bundle branch block. Circulation 1975;51:477-84.
  7. Zhang Z, Rautaharju PM, Soliman EZ, et al. Mortality risk associated with bundle branch blocks and related repolarization abnormalities (from the Women’s Health Initiative [WHI]). Am J Cardiol 2012;110:1489-95.
  8. Hirzel HO, Senn M, Nuesch K, et al. Thallium-201 scintigraphy in complete left bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:764-9.
  9. Wolk MJ, Bailey SR, Doherty JU, et al. ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:380-406.
  10. Higgins JP, Williams G, Nagel JS, Higgins JA. Left bundle-branch block artifact on single photon emission computed tomography with technetium Tc 99m (Tc-99m) agents: mechanisms and a method to decrease false-positive interpretations. Am Heart J 2006;152:619-26.
  11. Hayat SA, Dwivedi G, Jacobsen A, et al. Effects of left bundle-branch block on cardiac structure, function, perfusion, and perfusion reserve: Implications for myocardial contrast echocardiography versus radionuclide perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2008;117:1832-41.
  12. Task Force Members, Montalescot G, Sechtem U, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2949-3003.
  13. Surawicz B, Childers R, Deal BJ, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part III: intraventricular conduction disturbances: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:976-81.
  14. Holly TA, Abbott BG, Al-Mallah M, et al. Single photon-emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol Off Publ Am Soc Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:941-73.
  15. Romero-Farina G, Candell-Riera J, Aguadé-Bruix S, et al. Predictive variables for hard cardiac events and coronary revascularization in patients with normal left ventricular myocardial perfusion and systolic function. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013;40:1181-9.
  16. Alexiou S, Georgoulias P, Angelidis G, et al. Myocardial perfusion and left ventricular quantitative parameters obtained using gated myocardial SPECT: Comparison of three software packages. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;25:911-24.
  17. Hashemi Jazi M, Nilforoush P, Gharipour M, et al. Main clinical determinants of the presence of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parm 2015;86:267-72.
  18. Tabas JA, Rodriguez RM, Seligman HK, Goldschlager NF. Electrocardiographic criteria for detecting acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2008;52:329-36.e1.
  19. Bom MJ, Manders JMB, Uijlings R, et al. Negative predictive value of SPECT for the occurrence of MACE in a medium-sized clinic in the Netherlands. Neth Heart J 2014;22:151-7.
  20. Van De Wiele C, Rimbu A, Belhocine T, et al. Reversible myocardial perfusion defects in patients not suffering from obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease as assessed by coronary angiography: a review of the literature. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;62:325-35.
  21. Pons Masanés S, Molina Ferragut L, Paniagua Clusells J, Soler Massana JM. Eficacia de la ecocardiografía de esfuerzo en el diagnóstico del bloqueo de rama izquierda doloroso. A propósito de un caso. Rev Esp Cardiol 1998;51:245-7.
  22. Clerc OF, Possner M, Maire R, et al. Association of left bundle branch block with obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary CT angiography: a case–control study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:765-71.
  23. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:535-43.
  24. Elhendy A, Schinkel AFL, van Domburg RT, et al. Prognostic value of stress 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging in predicting all-cause mortality: a 6-year follow-up study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:1157-61.
  25. America YGCJ, Bax JJ, Boersma E, et al. Prognostic value of gated SPECT in patients with left bundle branch block. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:75-81.
  26. Demir H, Erbay G, Kir KM, et al. Clinical validation of technetium-99m MIBI-gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for avoiding false positive results in patients with left bundle-branch block: comparison with stress-rest nongated SPECT. Clin Cardiol 2003;26:182-7.
  27. Ten Cate TJF, Kelder JC, Bogaard MD, et al. The prognostic significance of typical perfusion defects on vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with left bundle branch block or right ventricular apical pacing. Nucl Med Commun 2009;30:232-9.
  28. Evangelista L, Nai Fovino L, Saladini F, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in low-risk patients with left bundle-branch block. Nucl Med Commun 2012;33:491-7.
  29. Candell-Riera J, Oller-Martínez G, Rosselló J, et al. Standard provocative manoeuvres in patients with and without left bundle branch block studied with myocardial SPECT. Nucl Med Commun 2001;22:1029-36.
  30. Sharir T, Germano G, Kang X, et al. Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction. J Nucl Med 2001;42:831-7.
  31. Nigam A, Humen DP. Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging with exercise and/or dipyridamole hyperemia in patients with preexisting left bundle branch block. J Nucl Med 1998;39:579-81.
  32. Hambÿe AS, Dobbeleir A, Derveaux M, et al. Determination of systolic thickening index with gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. A new parameter of myocardial viability? Clin Nucl Med 1997;22:172-5.
  33. Sillanmäki S, Lipponen JA, Tarvainen MP, et al. Relationships between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block and healthy controls. J Nucl Cardiol 2018; Feb 8. doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-1204-0. [Epub ahead of print].
  34. Engbers EM, Timmer JR, Mouden M, et al. Sequential SPECT/CT imaging starting with stress SPECT in patients with left bundle branch block suspected for coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 2017;27:178-87.
  35. Alexánderson E, Mannting F, Gómez-Martín D, et al. Technetium-99m-Sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with complete left bundle branch block. Arch Med Res 2004;35:150-6.
  36. Fovino LN, Saladini G, Mormino GP, et al. Risk stratification and prognostic assessment by myocardial perfusion-gated SPECT in patients with left bundle-branch block and low-intermediate cardiac risk. Ann Nucl Med 2012;26:559-70.
  37. Haataja P, Anttila I, Nikus K, et al. Prognostic implications of intraventricular conduction delays in a general population: the Health 2000 Survey. Ann Med 2015;47:74-80.
  38. Fahy GJ, Pinski SL, Miller DP, et al. Natural history of isolated bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol 1996;77:1185-90.
  39. Baldasseroni S, Opasich C, Gorini M, et al. Left bundle-branch block is associated with increased 1-year sudden and total mortality rate in 5517 outpatients with congestive heart failure: a report from the Italian network on congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 2002;143:398-405.
  40. Witt CM, Wu G, Yang D, et al. Outcomes with left bundle branch block and mildly to moderately reduced left ventricular function. JACC Heart Fail 2016;4:897-903.
  41. Dec GW, Fuster V. Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1564-75.
  42. Schneider JF, Thomas HE, Kreger BE, et al. Newly acquired left bundle-branch block: the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med 1979;90:303-10.
  43. Ficaro EP. Should SPET attenuation correction be more widely employed in routine clinical practice? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:409-12.
  44. Garcia EV. SPECT attenuation correction: an essential tool to realize nuclear cardiology’s manifest destiny. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:16-24.