Publicidad

Potencial de la 18F-FDG PET/CT en la evaluación de la prótesis ocular de MEDPOR

Referencias

  1. Asencio Sánchez VM, Alonso M, Sierra JM. Tomografía de emisión de positrones en el diagnóstico de recidiva orbitaria de un melanoma de coroides. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2005;80:113-5.
  2. Trichopoulos N, Augsburger J. Enucleation with uUnwrapped porous and nonporous orbital implants: A 15-year experience. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;21:331-6.
  3. Lin CJ, Liao SL, Jou JR, et al. Complications of motility peg replacement for porous hydryapatite orbital implants. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:394-6.
  4. Pan MH, Wu YW, Yen RF, et al. Different fibrovascularization rate between coralline hydroxyapatite and high density porous polyethylene (Medpore) measured by 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy 6 months after intraorbital implantation. Nucl Med Commun 2003;24:1237-41.
  5. Bordenave L. Nuclear medicine serving prostheses and biomaterials. ITBM-RBM 2005;26:206-11.
  6. Milind NN, Ramesh KM, Santosh GH. Comparison of vascularization of Medpor and Medpor-plus orbital implants: A prospective, randomized study. Ophtal Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;23:463-7.
  7. Graue GF, Finger PT. Physiologic Positron Emission Tomography/CT imaging of an integrated orbital implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;28:e4-6.