Publicidad
Artículo original 27 de enero de 2018

Influencia de la corrección de atenuación del SPECT-CT sobre el rendimiento diagnóstico para enfermedad coronaria. Correlación con coronariografía y análisis visual

Referenciar Imprimir Descargar PDF

Referencias

  1. Ali I, Ruddy TD, Almgrahi A, et al. Half-time SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with attenuation correction. J Nucl Med 2009;50:554-62.
  2. Huang R, Li F, Zhao Z, et al. Hybrid SPECT/CT for attenuation correction of stress myocardial perfusion imaging. Clin Nucl Med 2011;36:344-9.
  3. Grossman GB, Garcia EV, Bateman TM, et al. Quantitative Tc-99m sestamibi attenuation-corrected SPECT: Development and multicenter trial validation of myocardial perfusion stress gender-independent normal database in an obese population. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:263-72.
  4. Malkerneker D, Brenner R, Martin WH, et al. CT-based attenuation correction versus prone imaging to decrease equivocal interpretations of rest/stress Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT MPI. J Nucl Cardiol 2007;14:314-23.
  5. Pitman AG, Kalff V, Van Every B, et al. Contributions of subdiaphragmatic activity, attenuation, and diaphragmatic motion to inferior wall artifact in attenuation-corrected Tc-99m myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2005;12:401-9.
  6. Hayes SW, De Lorenzo A, Hachamovitch R, et al. Prognostic implications of combined prone and supine acquisitions in patients with equivocal or abnormal supine myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1633-40.
  7. Goetze S, Brown TL, Lavely WC, et al. Attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT: Effects of misregistration and value of reregistration. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1090-5.
  8. Xu Y, Fish M, Gerlach J, et al. Combined quantitative analysis of attenuation corrected and non-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT: Method development and clinical validation. J Nucl Cardiol 2010;17:591-9.
  9. Singh B, Bateman TM, Case JA, Heller G. Attenuation artifact, attenuation correction, and the future of myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:153-64.
  10. Montes C, Tamayo P, Hernandez J, et al. Estimation of the total effective dose from low-dose CT scans and radiopharmaceutical administrations delivered to patients undergoing SPECT/CT explorations. Ann Nucl Med 2013;27:610-7.
  11. Fleischmann KE, Hunink MGM, Kuntz KM, et al: Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging. JAMA 1998; 280:913-20.
  12. Kuntz KM, Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, et al: Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with chest pain. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130:709-18.
  13. Hendel RC, Corbett JA, Cullom SJ, et al: The value and practice of attenuation correction for myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging: A joint position paper from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Nucl Cardiol 2002; 9:135-43.
  14. Heller GV, Links J, Bateman TM, et al: American Society of Nuclear Cardiology and Society of Nuclear Medicine Joint Position Statement: Attenuation Correction of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Scintigraphy. J Nucl Cardiol 2004; 11:229-30.
  15. Ficaro E, Fessler J, Shreve P, et al. Simultaneous transmission/emission myocardial perfusion tomography: diagnostic accuracy of attenuation corrected Tc-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 1996; 93: 463-73.
  16. Slart RHJA, Que TH, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Effect of attenuation correction on interpretation of 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the impact of 1 year’s experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag 2003; 30:1505-9.
  17. Genovesi D, Giorgetti A, Gimalli A, et al. Impact of attenuation correction and gated acquisition in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the multicentre SPAG (SPECT Attenuation Correction vs Gated) study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag, 2011; 38:1890-8.
  18. Benkiran M. Is CT attenuation correction more efficient than gated SPECT analysis to improve the diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with low prevalence of ischemic heart disease? Nucl Med Commun 2015; 36:69-77.
  19. Sharma P, Chetan DP, Sellam K, et al. Comparative accuracy of CT attenuation-corrected and non-attenuation-corrected SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Clin Nucl Med 2012; 37:332-8.
  20. Matsunari I, Boning G, Ziegler SI, et al. Attenuation-corrected rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial SPECT in normals. J Nucl Cardiol 1998; 5:48-55.
  21. Banzo I, Pena FJ, Allende RH, et al. Prospective clinical comparison of non-corrected and attenuation- and scatter-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with suspicion of coronary artery disease. Nucl Med Commun 2003; 24: 995-1002.